William Shakespeare, poet and renowned English playwright presented his Hamlet as a symbol of man in conflict particular literary approach and attitude to life, the cryptogram viewed distinction of man, viewed as a reflection societal problems. Hamlet is the name of a philosopher, the terrible eyes of bibliophiles are great lovers of Shakespeare’s favorite. It was indeed the heart of the reader for its beauty of truth encouraged to develop the maxim of human suffering and its dominant solutions. William Shakespeare was the greatest writer of all time. It was the only person who first discovered the extent of human psychology and emphasized the truth of beauty enhanced within the spirit of literature. In Hamlet, it was a critical examination of the philosophy of conflict between man and tries to provoke a change between the resentment of men and women. Shakespeare’s Hamlet is available as a sign of the model’s personality, his best attempt at heart, his curiosity was clear feelings about the death of his father. He was surprised to see the uncle of the behavior of his marriage with his mother. He was tormented by the thought of his emotional departure from this transient world unusual. He was informed of the death of his father, but he was taken wrong. Despite the darkness, he came upon the murderer of his father by the ghostly spirit of the experience of his father. But he was worried about the state of suspicion careful about the death of his father. Thus, he held a piece of “The act Gongago murder” if the facts and the drama critic of The Killers outweighed by the reactions of the spirit of the commission of crimes, obnoxious to the eye of a healthy society for understand the cause. It sells, it is the author of his father, who left him devastated as confirmed, invisible and unknown, what had happened. He promised to take revenge – Claudious and his mother. His remarks are famous vibrate violently against the public. He gave his best for the heart, like a cry of his feelings for the survival of life on Earth. “To be or not to be, that is the question.” He was devoted to revenge himself he live or die. He had to retaliate, in the sense that he delayed to suffer from indecision. He was at a loss what to do because he found an opportunity of revenge against the offender has been taken. He is inclined to act like a fool in the stadium as an excuse for him to take others into the darkness. Claudious think that Hamlet is some evidence, they should be identified as part of the conspiracy against King Hamlet. He took the political monologue to understand the depths of revenge. Due to the fact that it is the mental strength to energy sufficient order had been given the challenge of his uncle and his mother for punishing retaliation. He wanted to mental suffering by his unusual philosophy of life to find the application to identify a conclusion to his questioning the guilt. After Hamlet, it would not kill in the state, it remains in prayer in the church Claudious in the sense that it made a good crop in the world below. He was out to kill him in a way where he would get a real peace and serenity of his life and he is familiar with the fact that he was right in carrying out his mission and his father would be peace in the sense because of the eternal bliss to become the world below. Basically, he suffered from indecision and take revenge on them. In this context, TS Eliot, in his famous poem “My Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock “, by contrast, has common features and comparison between Hamlet and Prufrock, like Hamlet’s indecision had suffered. Prufrock was a man of indecision and how modern man and modern clothes, he seems mentally and physically, to do his job. But faced with real life, it is quite different. He has no power, facing his own wife has more he wants to delay its like Prince Hamlet. Because the fact, Hamlet, despite his quick wit and ability to revenge against the perpetrators, he knows in that, late in life philosophy and social friction, which was about courage and daring bed. He does not behave like a man fickle-mindedness that race has no obligation bad things in society to take. Prufrock time counted as frogs, cats and other mini- creatures to action for his mistress, who stubbornly do not like to take to move, as he keeps fit huge. Hence the poet says Elliot Prufrock in his voice: “My coat, my collar mounting firmly chin held dear and modest tie a plain “William Shakespeare is a truth, beauty in his famous book,” Hamlet showed. He opened a realm of the ideal man like that is never fickle mind and suffers from indecision to uproot the evils of society. Hamlet was a philosopher, poet and social reformer, but hidden, in spite of that quality in him, he was not rigid in its design, integrate action against evil. It was not full of courage and social reforms bed when he paid the usual, was to find errors of guilt. Ultimately, he was there, reality, after which decision and he confirmed the logical arguments. Queen and the others quickly identified as their enemy and attempted to end his life. In Hamlet, William Shakespeare, in terms of conspiracy and conflict of human misery significantly accelerated. The author has materials to the social environment in which men and women, relationships and philosophy of reality and the domain of survival are compatible on the ground raised by the contrast between the background of feelings humanity. It is a bit of literary event in the pages of his mind as a mirror of social unrest and evil act committed by them. Shakespeare was the person who understood the philosophy of modern life and culture against traditional social conflicts and contrasts spontaneously. He cited two trends conflict of the tragedy and were playing in the tragedy. Hamlet is a play of unhappiness and unrest, which have been accepted by the relationships and social crisis, as evidenced by his play for the acceleration of the fundamental strategy of life. If we are the conflicts of Hamlet spirit of judging, we find this way the human psyche, which is extremely broad and critical because of social friction. Ophalia had intimacy with Hamlet, but it had nothing to do Hamlet. Because their opinion is not set Hamlet as a man of parts, but a man of cowardice, since she started her own world of solitude. The three characters in Shakespeare’s play is remarkable, but they are quick in the sense that they fully own beliefs and hallucination were shipped. These three characters are : Desdemona, and Cordelia Ophalia that do nothing and something to gain favor to her lover. This sense of population analysis, if Hamlet had decided to die. It is the conflict of his spontaneous critical, because he did and it was not credible in his role and takes the wrong message to his superiors. He makes the rules of the game and watched the movements and attitudes, their feelings for the murder of his father. Regarding the hamlet of madness, he was not mad, but he was inclined to maintain or even mad. He arrived in the sense that people are fickle-minded in nature. It was about way of committing injustice and for this reason, he can forget the commitment to justice for all eternity. In this context, we find consistent cry of Hamlet with the following lines from a poem by Ella Wheeler Wilcox: “Laugh and the world laughs with you, cry and cry alone, because the sad old earth must borrow its joy, but has enough trouble of its own “In the last part of the story, we find all the ends of the two candidates and offenders . Hamlet has been added to the ends of his rivals and the offender. In his last words to Horatio, his friend, he asked, the real event of retaliation for people in the world after Hamlet had unlimited repulsion intellectual and suffering, he had to say at the end of his vengeance against the murderer of his father. To immortalize We like Hamlet in the sense that nobody is above the conflicts of man and sanctuary of justice with the king and queen, all suffer in the long term for all crimes. said in this connection, HW Longfellow: “Man is unjust, God is just and finally justice triumphs”