Product
The most comprehensive collection of theory and criticism, Now Up-to-date and world.
The Norton Anthology of Theory and criticism is the gold standard for those who want to develop and understand the current state of literary theory. With 185 pieces (31 of them new) from 148 authors (including 18 new ones), Norton anthology of theory and criticism, second edition, complete and diverse than in any other of their choice. . . more>>
It seems presumptuous to write to me dangerous, “” like a book without a doctorate in literature and in thirty years of professional experience as a teacher, but after one semester as an assistant during a one-person example I can say it is an ambitious, comprehensive and hence difficult (in all senses) volume. Start a mustache before Plato, and brings us all the way until the 1990s and issues of “hypertext,” the first giant Norton seems to work in the theory and the line from criticism to do what it has to be done. The NIP excellent introduction into the antitheorists bud out, “there is no free position of the theory, not even the so-called” common sense. “He also welcomed the intention of the students is the discovery and many opportunities to study literature, both for pleasure and edification, the conditions that we sometimes forget, are not mutually exclusive.
Half of the book to the theorists and critics of the twentieth century, meaning that more than half of what we call literary criticism written has been given everything. My personal wish is that this new century gives birth to an understanding of the theory that acknowledges how editors Chief Norton, from the perspective of the student, any theory is essentially a lens through which a particular work of art to literature, or the world in general. As with the opinion of some professionals, who tend against the territorial integrity can charitably Let’s opinion and they must work to live, too. In all cases, the most efficient lenses, can be found on the student’s eyes really, except a few different pairs were tested.
my friend Professor notes that the choice of many important writers are longer than those in Hazard Adams texts, she found in the past. This density, even investigation of two semesters is difficult to plan, curriculum-wise, especially because there are so many wonderful and to cover important voice and absorb the ideas. semiprofessional My advice would be to bring your love of literature and all your intellectual curiosity “The Norton Anthology of Theory and criticism”, but also remember, deep breaths from time to time that will last and never forget your sense of humor!
Rating: 05.05
This is one of the few comprehensive anthologies of literary theory on the market today, and among the best. The critical tradition, ed. David Richter, is also very good. But critical theory since Plato, ed. by Adams, is obsolete, and literary theory, ed. by Rivkin and Ryan, is not well treated, so that only short-range, and not complete without the cover of the classic critique. Unlike some previous reviewers, I found that Norton covers well the pre-twentieth century times. But the coverage of the modern age, while extensive, is still incomplete. The publishers, as is typical of Norton anthologies try to cover too much, and eventually leave some of the most important authors and works. There are too many essays by currently fashionable but ultimately uncertain post-colonial, race, queer, sex, and theorist of popular culture. There is nothing here of Brecht’s alienation effect on her famous. ” Where Shklovsky test things on “alienation”? Rene Girard, without a doubt one of the most important theorists of the twentieth century, completely missing in action – an omission rather shocking. Rey Chow, one of the most important theorists postcolonial also absent. The main actors Greenblatt, Bakhtin, Eagleton, Gilbert & Gubar, Showalter, Dubois, Henry Louis Gates, Derrida, Wolfgang Iser is included, but the publishers do not always choose their most important works. Like all anthologies Norton it is on paper, onion skin so thin that you can easily see, is printed by the next page. I hope the publishers to correct some of these errors in future editions, now it’s still one of the best anthologies of literary theory available and essential for all English majors and teachers. But consider also deals with the critical tradition of judges.
Rating: 5.4
While this is probably the best anthology of its kind, I am aware, and that other commentators note in the selection of theorists of the twentieth century is very rich, I think it’s not as hard as I ‘ had hoped the first time. Inevitably anthology could not always be complete, but it is surprising if someone like Carlyle, for example, does not guarantee that is mentioned in a number of introductory preface, an entry in its own right. It is not Ruskin, who is a * huge hole. I was also surprised that the section does not have a romantic theory of Keats-selection theory of a very strange omission. If you are mainly interested in theory
century pre-twentieth centuries, this is not your oracle. One glance at the index, it is evident that more than half of the twentieth century anthology material. Perhaps, the excessive criticism in the twentieth century, given two volumes of a historical overview would have reached more effectively. It is, as an anthology of the twentieth century, is exemplary. Indexes, bibliographies, tables of contents, etc., make the material much easier than you can wait and have the introductory preface, which appear before the selection of each author, concise, insightful and would be particularly useful for students struggling with some of these documents for the negotiations first. This preface opens new avenues of research within and outside of the anthology, so that readers easily identify the relevant theorists in their fields of interest.
Rating: 05.05
Few, if any, can not afford English teachers, not the text. Whether you’re teaching literature or history of criticism, the choice of the anthology to stimulate demand, the controversial interventions, the odds yours. It provides half again as many choices as the nearest competitor in the field of anthologies of literary criticism. In addition, publishers do a good job of slaughtering the most important texts of the chapters is to be published in the last thirty years, or those whose increasing value of recent concerns. This anthology offers a good selection of classics from Aristotle and Plato, Gorgias, but also and Longin (Boethius is often one of the few ancient anthology that does not cut). Most of the usual suspects are in the lineup, if the prosecution of the Pope or Johnson, or Kant, Schiller, Coleridge and Peacock Poe and Baudelaire, Marx and Engels or Arnold. In addition, critics who have never ruled out because of their place in this anthology: Du Bois, Trotsky, Lukacs, Gramsci, Lacan, Levi-Strauss, Fanon, Achebe, Hall, Vizenor, Wittig, Cixous, and many others.
Not only does this text provide an excellent choice, but the critical apparatus is excellent. Policies on a given selection Find the writers and historical criticism. There are times the author / title and subject index. The bibliographies in the back offers organized both chronologically and an essay of schools and movements. then displays the contents of both the sequence (for the birth of the author) and a table that lists alternative schools and movements. Therefore, a teacher for future theories of “modernity” can quickly become Baudelaire, Benjamin, Bellay, Eliot, Habermas, and directed so on.
scholar and teacher access to one or the needs sweeping views provided by an extensive personal library or institutional will not only be able to find many critical essays in this volume, but these texts easier find.
Rating: 05.05
As an English major, I had my share of anthologies. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism is for me because they have direct access to authors and their essays instead talks filtered, explained and dissected offer from them. It allows to explore the possibility that the author had to say in their own voice. unfortunately means that some choices are more difficult to read than others. The compromise is what you read, the source of the idea is rather a reflection. So I bought this book reads as a requirement of class (and I’m not done yet) offered me new perspectives to demonstrate that literature is not, but the world in general. This is probably the best thing I can say about this book. The worst? It is not easy to read – literally! Based on these bricks on campus for a semester death was not a pleasant experience regardless of how the tests are interesting.
Rating: 05.05